Image via CrunchBase
To me the answer is obvious. Of course the mobile web is a category of its own. Where have you been these past few years?
Twitter, FourSquare: Mobile Web Thingies
Fred Wilson responded to my blog post this morning. He declared we are in resonance.
Fred Wilson: Mobile First Web Second
John Battelle responded disagreeing with Fred.
John Battelle: It's All The Web
Of course it is all one web. But we are also all one humanity. Why do we talk of different cultures and heritages? Why do we talk of white and black and brown and yellow people? To acknowledge and respect and celebrate those various heritages is not to deny the wholeness of humanity.
I am in disbelief that John Battelle said what he said. Where has he been these past few years? The mobile web has so taken off. It is not possible he missed out on that.
The meme that the web is dead that has really taken off recently in some circles does not go well with me. I don't think iPhone apps are anywhere close to competing with the larger web. The iPhone apps enrichen the ecosystem, but they are a small subcategory.
Dead Web?
Friday, September 03, 2010
Information Overload And Twitter
Image by The Economist via CrunchBase
Twitter, FourSquare: Mobile Web Thingies
San Francisco Chronicle: Twitter Creator's Quest: Bring Order To The Chaos
There are people who argue Twitter should not try to be their email substitute. I come from another angle. I think Twitter ought to try and become our information overload engine. It should be our email, our news reader, our search engine, our social graph. It should attempt to be everything. Because I got only so much time in my day but I don't want to be missing out.
That is not to say Twitter should be the only engine. There is plenty of space for many engines. But there is something very sweet about 140 characters. But the Twitter of today is not delivering. It spent long months scaling poorly. And during those long months it totally skipped out on the adding new features part.
Sometimes I wonder if Twitter has not had the wrong CEO from the very beginning. Evan Williams should have been the Chairperson, Jack Dorsey should have been the CEO, and who is Biz Stone? The person inside the company in whom the DNA of the company exists, that person is Dorsey.
Towards Threaded Conversations On Twitter
Twitter: The Obvious Missing Features
Chris Dixon On Twitter: Not Impressive
Twitter Has To Scale The Signals
Twitter Does The Deed: Ads
Twitter Acquires Tweetie: The Drama
Twitter Need Get Work Done
Twitter Needs To Eat Into Its Ecosystem
Measuring Your Twitter Influence
Twitter, FourSquare: Mobile Web Thingies
San Francisco Chronicle: Twitter Creator's Quest: Bring Order To The Chaos
There are people who argue Twitter should not try to be their email substitute. I come from another angle. I think Twitter ought to try and become our information overload engine. It should be our email, our news reader, our search engine, our social graph. It should attempt to be everything. Because I got only so much time in my day but I don't want to be missing out.
That is not to say Twitter should be the only engine. There is plenty of space for many engines. But there is something very sweet about 140 characters. But the Twitter of today is not delivering. It spent long months scaling poorly. And during those long months it totally skipped out on the adding new features part.
Sometimes I wonder if Twitter has not had the wrong CEO from the very beginning. Evan Williams should have been the Chairperson, Jack Dorsey should have been the CEO, and who is Biz Stone? The person inside the company in whom the DNA of the company exists, that person is Dorsey.
GigaOm: Ev Williams: Twitter Will Actually Help Information Overload: Williams, an unusually theoretical CEO ..... compared Twitter to email, where information overload can be incapacitating ..... “The problem with email is that it’s sender-driven, and sender-driven media doesn’t scale” ..... recipient-based media can scale better “in a world of infinite information” ..... “Google is very good at ‘I need to solve a problem, I need to buy something, I need an answer,” he said. “Twitter is more ‘I’m interested in many things, I don’t know what I need to know.’” Where Google is more likely to be gamed by a company like Demand Media ....... scaling that system so you don’t have to pay attention to everything, but you don’t miss the stuff you care aboutReclaiming My Twitter Account
Towards Threaded Conversations On Twitter
Twitter: The Obvious Missing Features
Chris Dixon On Twitter: Not Impressive
Twitter Has To Scale The Signals
Twitter Does The Deed: Ads
Twitter Acquires Tweetie: The Drama
Twitter Need Get Work Done
Twitter Needs To Eat Into Its Ecosystem
Measuring Your Twitter Influence
Related articles by Zemanta
- Social news-reader Summify raises funds to solve information overload (venturebeat.com)
- Xobni Study: Email Overload Means We're Never Not Working (techcrunch.com)
- Solitude - A leadership habit (bcoelho2000.blogspot.com)
- Top 10 Twitter Apps: Why Mobile Use Is Rocketing on Twitter (readwriteweb.com)
- Um, Where's Twitter For Android On Twitter's Top 10 Apps? (techcrunch.com)
- 'Fireside Chat' with Evan Williams, CEO of Twitter by Claire Cain Miller of the New York Times (DanielOdio.com)
- Digg Technical Talks - Jack Dorsey (about.digg.com)
- SF Chronicle Profiles Twitter & Square Co-Founder Jack Dorsey (laughingsquid.com)
- Jack Dorsey connected the dots to create Twitter (James Temple/San Francisco Chronicle) (techmeme.com)
- E 2.0: Can the Enterprise Learn From Twitter's Success Secrets? (webtechman.com)
- The Top Twitter App is...Twitter.com (twitterrati.com)
- Twitter Now Over 145 Million Users, Almost 300,000 Apps (techcrunch.com)
- Follow Us on the New Digg (maketecheasier.com)
- Tips for Managing Social Media Information Overload (webworkerdaily.com)
- Social News-Reader Summify Raises Funds to Solve Information Overload (nytimes.com)
- Ev Williams: Twitter Will Actually Help Information Overload (gigaom.com)
YouTube And Online Movies
Image via Wikipedia
My point is if it can work for movie clips, it can work for full length movies. Pay per view online is also good,but it is not great. The business model has not caught up yet with technology. Viewers should have both options. You can pay per view, no ads, or you can watch for free, ads served. Choice, it's about choice.
The Web Not Yet Ready For The Video Format
Saavn's Great Business Model For Movies
New York Times: YouTube Ads Turn Videos Into Revenue: In the past, Lions Gate, which owns the rights to the “Mad Men” clip, might have requested that TomR35’s version be taken down. But it has decided to leave clips like this up, and in return, YouTube runs ads with the video and splits the revenue with Lions Gate..... more than one-third of the two billion views of YouTube videos with ads each week are like TomR35’s “Mad Men” clip — uploaded without the copyright owner’s permission but left up by the owner’s choice .... “YouTube is a big component of our display revenue, and display is our next big business” ..... YouTube will bring in around $450 million in revenue this year .... Revenue at YouTube has more than doubled each year for the last three years ...... YouTube shares advertising revenue with content partners, who may be big entertainment companies like Lions Gate or amateur videographers who have developed a following. Hundreds of these partners make more than $100,000 a year. Some, like Sal Khan, a former hedge fund manager who now makes math and science education videos, have quit their day jobs..... YouTube is testing a pay-per-view film rental service and broadcasting live events like concerts, and it just signed a deal to show on-demand Major League Baseball games in Japan...... YouTube now has 160 million mobile views a day, almost triple last year’s number. When Google introduces Google TV later this year, people will be able to watch YouTube videos on Internet-connected televisions.
My point is if it can work for movie clips, it can work for full length movies. Pay per view online is also good,but it is not great. The business model has not caught up yet with technology. Viewers should have both options. You can pay per view, no ads, or you can watch for free, ads served. Choice, it's about choice.
The Web Not Yet Ready For The Video Format
Saavn's Great Business Model For Movies
Related articles by Zemanta
- YouTube Works to Turn Piracy Into Revenue (nytimes.com)
- Copyright owners use YouTube ads as a backdoor into ¢A$H (shortformblog.com)
- Watch 'Life In a Day' Videos on YouTube (techie-buzz.com)
- New Search Deal Brings AOL Videos To YouTube (newteevee.com)
- Aniboom, Leader in Virtual Animation Production, Reaches 100 Million Views on YouTube (prweb.com)
- CHART OF THE DAY: 1 In 5 YouTube Users Upload A Video Each Month (GOOG) (businessinsider.com)
- New Search Deal Brings AOL Videos To YouTube (nytimes.com)
- Are You An Advertiser? Get More Control On YouTube (googletutor.com)
- YouTube Ads Turn Videos Into Revenue (Claire Cain Miller/New York Times) (techmeme.com)
- YouTube ads turn piracy into revenue (theglobeandmail.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)