Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Monday, October 22, 2012
The Stimulus Was Too Small
Description: Front side (obverse) of one of the Nobel Prize medals in Physiology or Medicine awarded in 1950 to researchers at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
The Secret of Our Non-Success
the stimulus was both too small and too short-lived, partly because of administration errors but mainly because of scorched-earth Republican obstructionAnd I argued the stimulus was too small back in 2009. Paul was going on deep knowledge, I was going on instinct.
The faster way to reduce the debt would be for this country to do another stimulus, this time a full trillion. But I don't see it happening. Such common sense would be too much to ask of the political system.
Related articles
- Paul Krugman: The Secret of Our Non-Success
- Romer: The Fiscal Stimulus, Flawed but Valuable
- About The Nobel Prize
- Paul "The $787 Billion Stimulus Was Too Small" Krugman, in 2008: I'm Calling for a Ginormous Stimulus, In the $600 Billion Ballpark
- Republicans' Economic Fantasies
- GOPer Calls Paul Krugman a 'Liar' For Telling The Truth
- Obama Lawlessness: Part II
- Russell Lynch: Where's the confidence fairy? Not in the jobs market...
- Paul Krugman: Triumph of the Wrong?
- Krugman: Press Can't Handle A Candidate Who Lies Like Romney
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)