If The Tweet Is The Atom, What Is Location?

The tweet is to the web what the atom is to the universe. Twitter was hot for the first half of last year. This year the heat/buzz seems to be with the location space people, FourSquare leading. What is location? Location is one of the sub atomic particles: electron, proton, neutron. Begs the question, what are the other sub atomic particles? And where are they? Are they in the works?

The mobile web is growing faster than the regular web, and location is so very fundamental in that space. It is so much easier to check in than to tweet out. When you are on the move, even 140 characters can feel long.

Maybe location is in a league of its own, maybe there are no other sub-atomic particles. Or maybe the tweet is the atom of the regular web and location in the atom of the mobile web. The atom metaphor can only be taken so far.

Check in is a basic feature. FourSquare has to try to own it, it has to extend that feature to other web properties. Google took over the web with Google ads. My blog and your blog could run Google ads. Facebook took over with Facebook Connect. FourSquare needs to do something similar. There is a much lesser incentive for my check in to exist on the FourSquare website than it is for my social graph to primarily reside on Facebook.com. You want to be able to take your check in with you to many other places.

I made this point in a comment I left at the official FourSquare blog when the Please Rob Me controversy was raging. (Location! Location! Location!)

More recently I came across a blog post by Robert Scoble that was another aha moment for me as far as FourSquare is concerned.

Only a few days before that Robert had put out a blog post that was rather hostile to FourSquare and the location space in general: Malleable Social Graphs And Mini-Mobs: Why Facebook Could Destroy Foursquare And Gowalla With One Check In.

Basically what he was saying was Facebook was going to offer location, and that was going to kill FourSquare. I left a comment saying Robert, dude, you are so missing out. A few days later he put out a blog post that blew my mind: Are Location Geeks At Where 2.0 Off The Path To Real Money?

In this post he was saying he wanted to check in into future locations. He wanted to be able to say where he was going to check in a week or a month from now, and that that check in was more monetizable. I agree. I wonder how FourSquare will respond to that.

Craig Newmark, Dennis Crowley, Jennifer 8 Lee: Koreatown

Related articles by Zemanta

• Pre-boarding: A Novel Use of FourSquare (trueslant.com)
• What Do People REALLY Think Of... Foursquare? (businessinsider.com)
• VCs Rush Forward With Cash, Declaring "Foursquare Crushed Gowalla" (businessinsider.com)
• Foursquare and Gowalla: location games are where it's at (guardian.co.uk)
• Silicon Alley Insider: A Fresh Look At Foursquare: "No way any normal motherf**cker is going do this check-in sh*t" (businessinsider.com)
• Checkin Mania Shows You Who's Checking in around You (appscout.com)
• Do Location Apps Need to Show Users the Money? (gigaom.com)
• Foursquare takes lead in where-am-I apps (cnn.com)
• Silicon Alley Insider: JEFF JARVIS: What is content, anyway? (businessinsider.com)

The Inbox Could See New Life This Year

Fred Wilson: Social Networking Vs. Email

(I was writing this as a comment at his blog, but it became long enough that I decided to make a blog post out of it.)

Social networking has surpassed email, search and is doing great in the news department. Those three were just three of the biggest web activities before these social networks came along. That is really something. (Email, Search, News)

But don't count out the inbox. I'd say location, random connections and the inbox are the three big things to look for this year. There is some interesting stuff going on in the inbox territory, I just have not had the time to figure out who the leader there is.

The inbox will rebound. That is not to say it will take back its lead. China was once the leading country on the planet.

Curiously Twitter might lead the revival of the information graph. But not the Twitter of today. (Twitter Needs To Eat Into Its Ecosystem)

The email inside Facebook is still Facebook. It is not email. Only people in your network can email you, for the most part, and do. And they do so rarely.

I don't mind being on mailing lists as long as they have a one click unsubscribe option at the bottom of each email they send out. If I am going to delete without reading anyway, why bother sending it to me? But then those dictators in Nigeria just seem to need 0.1% to respond, and that keeps them in business. So.

Even in social networking I don't believe Facebook has the final word. I have a feeling we will see a swing from the we to the me in a few years. (The Next Big Thing In Social Networking)

Related articles by Zemanta

• Social Networking vs Email (myventurepad.com)
• Union Square Ventures Job Opening: I Am Applying (technbiz.blogspot.com)
• Twitter isn't a platform. Yet. (whydoeseverythingsuck.com)
• Twitter Is Not (Yet) A Game Platform (businessinsider.com)
• Developers In Denial: The Seesmic Case Study (techcrunch.com)
• Google And Twitter Wanted To Buy Bit.ly, But Bit.ly Is Waiting For A "Big F---ing Number" (businessinsider.com)
• How Twitter won the platform gamble (venturebeat.com)
• Get Used To Twitter Buying Companies (newcommbiz.com)