There is great danger that Barnes And Noble might attempt to hobble Amazon because, in 1994, Barnes And Noble had gobbles of money, and Amazon had none, and Capitol Hill is pay as you go. In 2009 we saw Wall Street walk away with murder. The moneyed interests of the old might get in the way of the new. And their nefarious attempts might have the legitimacy of misguided regulation. The new innovators have to get into the political fight. They have to be part of the debate. They have to be in the arena. They have to show up on the Hill, and they have to show up in the court of public opinion.
The primary purpose of crypto regulation ought to be to make business possible.
There is a line of thought, and I subscribe to it, that America is a different kind of country. I am plenty critical of the US political system as it exists today, it is an imperfect union, but at the bottom of it I do believe America is an idea, this oldest modern democracy carries the unique responsibility of holding the torch in the far corners of the world. You could spend 700 billion dollars every year on guns and trillions on forevermore wars, you could spend hundreds of billions on diplomacy, or you could, at no direct cost to you, let crypto do the work of empowering individuals everywhere. The Blockchain is about empowering individuals everywhere, and this is much more fundamental than voting rights. The suggestion is that the individual right here in the US is not sufficiently empowered. The entrenched status quo will come by the way of regulations to stop the unstoppable work of empowerment. And that worries me.
It is said when they first started making movies, they would simply capture plays with movie cameras. It was some time before they realized the movie can be its own product. Blockchain native products and services can not be captured with regulations that were designed for the previous era unless the idea is to suffocate the innovation.
I think the best way to regulate will be to bring the cat to the table. The top 100 crypto companies around the world by market cap should form a consortium, perhaps to be called Blockchain100, that will each send a Chief Policy Officer to it, and together they will suggest laws and regualtions to national parliaments around the world, of course, to be debated by elected officials and the general public, but spearheaded by those in the know. Because ultimately it is about the consumers. The most successful crypto products, by definition, will be those that are effortlessly understood.
How do you solve identity? Most people on the planet lack identity that they can take to the bank. How do you solve credit history? The dollar a day people are the best at paying loans, but nobody gives them loans. How do you solve that? Sidewalk businesses around the world have no bookkeepers, and because they don't, they can't go to banks and get loans. How do you make it possible for their excellent businesses to easily get loans? The SEC is not even asking those questions. Crypto has the solutions. And so the SEC should know when to stay out of the way.
The Blockchain is a concrete promise that every single transaction can be completely traced. That is not a place where criminals can go to hide. That is a place where criminals will find it impossible to hide. But we don't want a surveillance regime. And so regulation will have to be able to do it just right. That is a challenge. Engineers are not lawmakers. We pay lawmakers fat money. They might as well rise up to the challenge. They should know when to lead, follow, or get out of the way. Or we should hire a new set.
The Blockchain will take democracy to every country. The SEC, the IRS, the CFTC, FinCEN, the OCC, and that entire alphabet soup does not even have it in their vocabulary to attempt something like that. The thing is, the Blockchain is unstoppable. Regulatory agencies don't want to be like the emperor who went to the banks of a flooding river and asked it to stop. He thought emperors are supposed to command, and the commands will be obeyed.
@GrantDarcy I dare you to find a better combo on political instincts and feel for tech in any one person for the Senior Policy, US role I applied for yesterday. :) ... Something more fundamental than voting rights is about to happen.
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) March 5, 2022
The Purpose Of #Crypto Regulation https://t.co/BVWqcWXLhS @Coinbase @BitcoinMagazine @aantonop @APompliano @karacalvert @brian_armstrong @GrantDarcy @fredwilson @albertwenger @thegothamgal @bfeld @msuster @cdixon @vkhosla @nihalmehta #blockchain #cryptocurrency
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) March 6, 2022
The Purpose Of #Crypto Regulation https://t.co/BVWqcWXLhS @alexisohanian @MariaShen @divine_economy @chaserchapman @Flynnjamm @JuliaLipton @fodmc @mccannatron @eshita
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) March 6, 2022
The Purpose Of #Crypto Regulation https://t.co/BVWqcWXLhS @mattshap1 @ljin18 @awrigh01 @AnnikaSays @puntium @gaby_goldberg @jpoGMI @aweissman @jacksondahl @richardchen39 @fkpxls @Cooopahtroopa @HanelBaveja
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) March 6, 2022
Applied yesterday for Senior Manager, US Policy. https://t.co/Mz97JlOWHe
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) March 5, 2022
Canada, Ukraine and Russia have sparked a turning point for crypto.
— Layah Heilpern (@LayahHeilpern) March 6, 2022
You are only one incorrect opinion and one war away from being shut out from the world.
The #bitcoin age is officially upon us.
If another VC who passes on my round asks "do you know of @ArlanWasHere " I will flip a freakin table lmao Do I know of Arlan Hamilton?? What Black startup founder doesn't?! Do you not realize that you all ask us this? Do you realize that Arlan can't write us all checks? 😂
— BEE LAW (@bossassbee_) March 6, 2022
No comments:
Post a Comment